Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 07/20/09 11:49, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> So, if nobody requests continued support for zlib in libxml2, I will >> disable that feature in one of the next DEV300 builds. > > Removed as > <http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/sb113/rev/9f8e75ebe727>. > Dropping the dependency on zlib from libxml2, I also in turn dropped the > dependency on zlib from libxmlsec, libxstl, and redland, assuming those > were transitive dependencies brought in by direct dependencies of those > modules on libxml2. Let me know if that causes any build breakers in > any elaborate --with-system-whatever configurations... > > -Stephan
hi stephan, just noticed that libxmlsec/xmlsec1-1.2.6.patch contains its own hacked up version of the xml2-config script. sometime last year i've changed the libxml2 module so it delivers its own xml2-config into the solver (surprisingly, that was not done before), and removed another such script from, iirc, libxslt. seems like i missed this one. given that you play with this stuff anyway, can you try just removing the xml2-config from the libxmlsec patch? -- "C++ has the lethal combination of looking all nice and simple on the surface and having lots of traps installed under the surface, waiting for a victim." -- Yossi Kreinin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
