On 1/11/10 4:32 PM, Fabio A. Miranda wrote:
hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:33:08AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
r...@catullus:~# /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker
^^^^
/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker:
/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/../../ure-link/lib/libstdc++.so.6:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by
/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk/bin/uno-skeletonmaker)
r...@catullus:~#
Are the packages of OOo itself (incl. file
/opt/openoffice.org/ure/lib/libstdc++.so.6) and the OOo SDK package
(/opt/openoffice.org/basis3.1/sdk) coming from the same source (either
both from your Ubuntu installation, or both from the OOo download site)?
(Obviously) both are from the download site? Ubuntu doesn't have OOo
installed in /opt, and neither does it ship a copy of libstdc++6.
Exactly. The reason is simple: Create an add-on in NB, and try to run it
with Ubuntu's default version of OO and see it if works.
i am not aware of critical changes or better differences in this area.
If you have developed an extension with NB (which of course can be an
Java extensions only) on Windows for example it should run on Ubuntu as
well. When if find time i will try it out with a plain Ubuntu office in
a VM.
Juergen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
