On 14/06/2010 13:05, Bartosz wrote:
>> I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
>> can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
>> because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
>> which was an annoying result.
>
> Great. If you could find this patch, it will be very useful.
>
> Should we create the new class which replace the "SvArray" (it will be used
> STL)
> or just replace all SvArray to STL directly?
>
> I think the first idea is better to maintenance (but it is a little bit
> harder to implement),
> the second idea is a little bit harder to implement, and it will be difficult
> to add some new features to all new arrays.
definitely use STL directly.
the SvArray interface has really ugly warts, like C40_INSERT.
yes, it's a bit more effort that way (especially for the sorted SvArrays),
but the end result will be better.
> Best Regards
> Bartosz
PS: oh, and i second cmc's suggestion: don't touch binfilter.
it's almost dead anyway.
--
"Data structures are frozen algorithms." -- Jon Bentley
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
