On 14.06.2010 23:32, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 06/14/2010 07:05 AM, Bartosz wrote:
I thought I had a patch somewhere to do some of the conversion, but I
can't find it now. I remember that I didn't go ahead with it at the time
because my first cut at it left OOo larger than it was before hand,
which was an annoying result.
Great. If you could find this patch, it will be very useful.
Should we create the new class which replace the "SvArray" (it will be
used STL)
or just replace all SvArray to STL directly?
I think the first idea is better to maintenance (but it is a little
bit harder to implement),
the second idea is a little bit harder to implement, and it will be
difficult to add some new features to all new arrays.
Best Regards
Bartosz
Changing out SvArray, will fix this long standing bug, which will bring
great joy and happiness to my life.
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=84159
Unfortunately just exchanging the implementation of the array won't fix
anything. There will still be code that works with such arrays and if
this code uses 16 Bit integers to access the array elements, not that
much would be won. So how much could be achieved in which time span
depends on the way how a particular array is used. The more local the
code, the easier will it be to change this.
Regards,
Mathias
--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "nospamfor...@gmx.de".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
