On 16.02.2011 12:21, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 16/02/11 11:57, rony a écrit :
>
> Hi Rony,
>
>
>   
>>> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=92926
>>>   
>>>       
>> *UNBELIEVABLLE !!!*
>>
>> This is just unbelievable, having P2 priority and no one really fixes this 
>> for years it seems? How can that be possible?? 
>>
>>     
> Oh, and getting system python to work on Mac, instead of having to
> bundle another version within OOo, have you looked at that one yet ? ;-)
> How long has that been around ? 4 or 5 years ?? Always boils down to
> developer resources in the end.
>   
Yes, that's always the best excuse, if those with the powers don't
appreciate something.

It seems that no one at Oracle/Sun's management realizes the importance
of scripts/macros.

E.g. OOo's scripting framework is written in Java, but to this very day
they do not take advantage of that and add JSR-223 support to it.
JSR-223 support means, that all scripting languages that work (available
starting with Java 6, or from the Apache Software Foundation as BSF 3.0
which can be deployed for Java 1.4 and up) with Java, would be
immediately be available for OOo!

It would be possible to write a single editor which would edit and run
all JSR-223 scripts out of the box. Unbelievably, this has not been done
to this very day.

If there was JSR-223 support in OOo's scripting framework then one could
use Jython as well. (Of course the OOo language binding of Python would
make "pure" Python desirable.)

Again, if strategic, tactical thoughts would play a role in this
important context of OOo scripting too, then such changes/additions
would have been implemented long ago. My  hope is that eventually the
forces in power wake up as long as there is time...
;)

---rony


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to