On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Hendrik Siedelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/4/27 Marcus Wolschon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > | Nodes can still be identified by their lat/lon coordinates. As nodes > > | are not duplicated in the database this is possible. And routing still > > | needs to find which ways reference a node, so routing from one way to > > | another is still complicated. On the other hand checking if another > > | way uses the same points is fast on a spatial database (I will at some > > | time provide funktions provide routing) > ... > > So the system cannot know the difference between 2 ways sharing the same > > node and 2 ways with 2 nodes that just share the same coordinates? > > > > Yes for the database it's the same. On the other hands if two nodes > share the same coordinates they should be joined (Thats what I read), > so there will never be two nodes at the same coordinates. (At least in > theory)
This is incorrect. In OpenStreetMap two nodes can share the same coordinates, and each belong to a separate way. This does *not* imply that the ways are connected - in fact, quite the opposite. This is why ways reference nodes, not coordinates. I think you've misunderstood a fundamental part of our data model! What you are doing is fine for raster rendering (and is in fact how osm2pgsql works, converting ways into Linestrings) where topology is unimportant, but is completely incorrect for routing. Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
