Hi Tom Following your update, I just tested and a newly updated track was indeed private now - so there's your 'second opinion'.
Thanks. I'll soon be testing my updated app too (using visibility). Mario Tom Hughes-2 wrote: > > On 12/09/09 17:23, Tom Hughes wrote: >> On 12/09/09 17:01, le_top wrote: >> >>> I think it would be best to provide some backward compatibility for the >>> 'public' parameter - the API version did not change so that would be >>> logical. >> >> As I explained, there is backwards compatibility code. There is >> obviously a problem with it, but it does exist. > > It should be fixed now. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) > http://www.compton.nu/ > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GPX-upload-in-0.6-API---private-track-upload-not-working-tp25108661p25416361.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
