2009/10/7 Dan Homerick <danhomer...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2009/10/6 Dan Homerick <danhomer...@gmail.com>: >>> Ideally, leisure=park areas (which have an alpha transparency less >>> than 1) would render on top of landuse=* areas (which mostly/all? seem >>> to have an alpha of 1). >> >> there would be a different conflict though: forests in Parks. They >> would not show up any more. This conflict cannot be solved by just >> chnaging the rendering order... > > Why is this? That is, what is special about forests as compared to > say, landuse=wood? Rendering a park on top of a wood seems to nicely > convey that it's a wooded area in the park.
there is nothing special to forest or wood. Woods share the same problem. If you render a park atop the landuse, the woods will disappear below. That's OK for a park inside a wood, but it's not OK for a wood inside the park. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
