Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > We can solve all issues (again) and see what happens in a month. > > But we can already check if the revisions of the objects were made > > using [the program that shall not be named]. > > Or you could actually read the code and tell me where amf_controller is > writing to the database without undergoing the model's usual integrity > checks. Because AFAIK they are exactly the same as those in the XML API and > there is no, repeat no, basis for you to make snitty little insinuations > like this. > > Line 594 of amf_controller is where you should start looking. Oh yeah, > you're too lazy to make the effort to read Ruby code, I remember from last > time. Sheesh.
I don't know about the previous discussion. Most of the changesets do not have any created_by tag (maybe it is too new on changesets), some are Potlatch 1.2a, 1.2c To me the editor used does not matter, because I think the API should prevent it to happen. Did I get it right that you are directly writing to the database? What was the reason for doing so? Cheers Mitja _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
