Frederik Ramm wrote: > The raw data can be interpreted in many ways. What we have seen is > one interpretation.
Until the mail eventually goes out saying "please have a look at this and consider relicensing your data", it's entirely irrelevant anyway. At present, any stats measuring voluntary ODbL sign-ups against total OSM users are simply a measure of how effective (or otherwise) the communications have been in reaching users. Nothing more. You might as well use any of the zillions of polls that have been conducted, or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:ODbL_Supporter vs http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Users_Rejecting_ODbL, or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Users_whose_contributions_are_in_the_public_domain vs http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Users_whose_contributions_are_not_in_the_public_domain, or stick a divining rod over Kent and say "ommmmmmmmmm" for all the benefit it will give you. [follow-ups to legal-talk, probably] cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/new-contributor-terms-ID-list-tp5458329p5460816.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
