Ben Supnik wrote: > >> But I do feel that the area as an OSM primitive is badly needed. Here >> even _with_ external semantics it is sometimes difficult to determine >> whether an OSM way represents a polyline or a closed polygon. > > Agreed 100%. :-) If we end up with a real area primitive and nothing > else happens regarding compositing, etc. I'd still be a happy camper. >
+1 -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Relation-Multipolygon-Area-tp6286236p6293424.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
