On 04.12.14 12:33, Tom Hughes wrote: > So in other words, most of things we already factor in to our spam scoring... > We're just not quite as rigid.
A (hidden) spam score is bad (IMO). Nobody sees it, almost nobody can test it. A documented "user level" with documented rules would make much more sense and (IMO) would much more likely be accepted. > In particular you can still post (within reason) without having made any edits > - it is actually surprisingly common for non-spammers to do that. OSM is not a blog site. OSM is about making the data better. Once you have somehow figured out a little bit how OSM works, you could blog about it. IMO. /al _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
