On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > + have a 802.1Q header if it has a nonzero VLAN ID.
In other places, "an 802.1Q" is used instead of "a 802.1Q". > + Any packet with an 802.1Q header with a nonzero VLAN ID that > + ingresses on an access port is dropped, regardless of whether the > + VLAN ID in the header is the access port's VLAN ID. > + (Priority-tagged frames are allowed on ingress.) Do you think it's worth forward-referencing the description of priority-tagged frames? Or a parenthetical "(those with a VLAN ID of zero)"? Otherwise, it looks good. Thanks, --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
