On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 05:10:14PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > + have a 802.1Q header if it has a nonzero VLAN ID. > > In other places, "an 802.1Q" is used instead of "a 802.1Q".
OK, I did s/a/an/ here. > > + Any packet with an 802.1Q header with a nonzero VLAN ID that > > + ingresses on an access port is dropped, regardless of whether > > the > > + VLAN ID in the header is the access port's VLAN ID. > > + (Priority-tagged frames are allowed on ingress.) > > Do you think it's worth forward-referencing the description of > priority-tagged frames? Or a parenthetical "(those with a VLAN ID > of zero)"? I decided to just delete the parenthetical since "with an 802.1Q header with a nonzero VLAN ID" already covers that case. Thanks, Ben. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
