On 01/19/15 at 10:01am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I realize that a shared library was mentioned elsethread as having some > importance, but I don't understand why. ovn-controller and the other C > components of OVN will be just as useful whether they are statically or > dynamically linked to the OVS libraries.
From my perspective, this exclusively benefits the distributions as it decouples OVN and OVS releases. Otherwise, a bug in the static library would require distributing a new OVN package. From a developer perspective, there should be no difference at all. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
