> On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:42:01PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: >> Recirculation id was scanned without a mask, which led to it being >> ignored. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <[email protected]> > > Do you know what the idea was here? Is it just that it doesn't make > sense to bitwise match the recirc_id, so we didn't want to support it? >
I think this is the case, and maybe it would be better to fix this by scan it without a mask and always return a full mask. Jarno > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
