On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:46:29AM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 9:55 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:42:01PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > >> Recirculation id was scanned without a mask, which led to it being > >> ignored. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com> > > > > Do you know what the idea was here? Is it just that it doesn't make > > sense to bitwise match the recirc_id, so we didn't want to support it? > > I think this is the case, and maybe it would be better to fix this by > scan it without a mask and always return a full mask.
I think that's likely to have been the intent here, even if it was buggy. > Jarno > > > > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev