On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > <dt><code>resubmit;</code></dt> > > - <dd>execute next logical datapath table as subroutine</dd> > > + <dd> > > + Executes the next logical datapath table as a subroutine. > > + </dd> > > Should we indicate that it's the next higher version table number? > Resubmit always makes me think it's going back to the same table. In > fact, I wonder if something like "next-table" would be a more accurate > name.
You're right, "resubmit" isn't the best name here. We need a name that's a valid identifier (so far, the syntax for identifiers is C-like). I'm OK with "next_table" although it seems somewhat long. Do you think just "next" is good enough? This is an OK time to change it but I don't want to change it more than once. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
