> On Apr 28, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:40:45PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: >> >>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >>> >>> <dt><code>resubmit;</code></dt> >>> - <dd>execute next logical datapath table as subroutine</dd> >>> + <dd> >>> + Executes the next logical datapath table as a subroutine. >>> + </dd> >> >> Should we indicate that it's the next higher version table number? >> Resubmit always makes me think it's going back to the same table. In >> fact, I wonder if something like "next-table" would be a more accurate >> name. > > You're right, "resubmit" isn't the best name here. > > We need a name that's a valid identifier (so far, the syntax for > identifiers is C-like). I'm OK with "next_table" although it seems > somewhat long. Do you think just "next" is good enough? This is an OK > time to change it but I don't want to change it more than once.
"next" works for me. --Justin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
