On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 05:35:14PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote:
> > I'm not fully comfortable with assert-failing (killing ovs-vswitchd) if
> > the flow table has unsupported features in it. Also, even when HSA
> > doesn't kill the process due to assert-failing, it could still delay the
> > process by an arbitrary amount of time. Do you have an idea for a way
> > to keep curious admins from accidentally taking down their switch by
> > running an HSA command ("hey, what does this ovs-appctl command do?")?
>
> Sure, the asserts are more for alerting things at development time.
> Will change to VLOG.
Great.
> Also, I can only think of separating the logic info a thread to prevent
> it from blocking the main thread?
I don't know whether that is practical. Is it? If not, then let's not
worry about it for now. If it becomes a problem, we'll come up with
something.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
