On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM -0700, William Tu wrote: >> Should we expose "truncate" to the ovs-ofctl action list? >> >> I was thinking about this ovs-ofctl syntax: >> actions='output(max_len=64, port=1), output:2' >> >> then at datapath it translates to actions >> truncate(64), output(1), output(2) >> >> So 64B to port1, and 100B to port2. > > I think that's OK. > > Pravin or Joe, do you have an opinion?
Seems fine. As an aside, it might be worth creating some tests that output to a bond port to ensure that case works, in addition to the existing cases. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
