On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:56:50PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: > On 12 April 2016 at 21:13, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:38:38AM -0700, William Tu wrote: > >> Should we expose "truncate" to the ovs-ofctl action list? > >> > >> I was thinking about this ovs-ofctl syntax: > >> actions='output(max_len=64, port=1), output:2' > >> > >> then at datapath it translates to actions > >> truncate(64), output(1), output(2) > >> > >> So 64B to port1, and 100B to port2. > > > > I think that's OK. > > > > Pravin or Joe, do you have an opinion? > > Seems fine. > > As an aside, it might be worth creating some tests that output to a > bond port to ensure that case works, in addition to the existing > cases.
I don't know what that means; there are no "bond ports" at the OpenFlow level. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev