On 5 July 2016 at 07:31, Zong Kai LI <zealo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Ben and Guru. I tried to test lb feature on my OpenStack env, but > failed. > The simplest topology, three VMs(cirros) and VIP are on the same switch. > VM2 and VM3 are endpoints for the VIP. > I tried to use ping and ssh to test VIP, but things don't work. > Yeah, the current feature works when the destination endpoints (servers) are in a different subnet than the client. i.e. there has to be a router in-between. The documentation should have clarified that, sorry!
I have a patch in my tree here that works for your use case too. https://github.com/shettyg/ovs/commit/f961026fc0dd4645e5bcf1e819b8de99a7c3f95a I will clean it up (i.e. add documentation) and send it out for review. > > I think it should be arp issue. > First, in table ls_in_arp_rsp, there is no flow entry to response for VIP. > Second, in table ls_in_l2_lkup, it will determine which port to output per > packet eth.dst. I'm not familiar with with conntrack, but it seems have > nothing to process on packet L2 address, when I run "conntrack -L". So I > suppose this is another place will cause load balance failure. > > Thanks. > Zong Kai, LI > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
