On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:48:40PM +0000, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > I'm not sure I'm 100% comfortable back porting this to branch-2.5 > > I see the change more as a feature rather than a bugfix. > > Also it touches some core modules (seq and rcu) in a non trivial way. > > > What do you guys think?
The latency issue is considered a bug for us, unfortunately. fbl > > Thanks, > > Daniele > > On 22/07/2016 15:03, "Flavio Leitner" <f...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >(adding ovs-dev mailing list and more people interesting on > >the backport to CC) > > > >On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:31:52AM +0000, Vinod, Chegu wrote: > >> Hi Flavio, Karl, > >> > >> Is there a version of the following fix available that is compatible with > >> OVS 2.5? > >> > >> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/9dede5cff553d7c4e074f04c525c1417eb209363 > >> > >> If yes can it backported to the 2.5 branch ? > > > >branch-2.5 is affected by the same issue. I tested the patch from > >branch master (cherry-pick) and it solved the issue. > > > >Daniele, > > > >What do you think? If you agree, do you need me to post the > >backported patch or is it enough for you to cherry-pick? > > > >Thanks, > >-- > >fbl > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -- fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
