Fair point, I guess this looks more like a bug fix than a new features.

After discussing offline with Ben and having another set of eyes on the changes 
I backported this to branch-2.5.

Thanks,

Daniele


On 25/07/2016 02:29, "Loftus, Ciara" <ciara.lof...@intel.com> wrote:

>> 
>> Thanks Flavio for checking and Daniel for your consideration.
>> Indeed the issue exists in 2.5 branch.
>> 
>> We are treating this more in the bucket of a performance bug fix than a
>> feature.
>> 
>> Any specific testing that you would like to see run to help reduce
>> your concern related to changes to the core modules ?
>> 
>> Ciara, what's your opinion on these changes for a backport ?
>
>I'm of the same opinion as yourself and Flavio that this is more a fix than a 
>feature. I'd like to see it backported.
>But I understand there may be some risk associated with due to the nature of 
>the changes.
>
>Thanks,
>Ciara
>
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Vinod
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniele Di Proietto [mailto:diproiet...@vmware.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:49 PM
>> To: Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com>; Vinod, Chegu
>> <chegu_vi...@hpe.com>
>> Cc: kris...@redhat.com; ovs-dev <dev@openvswitch.org>; Loftus, Ciara
>> <ciara.lof...@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: Backport Request: dpif-netdev: Remove PMD latency on
>> seq_mutex
>> 
>> I'm not sure I'm 100% comfortable back porting this to branch-2.5
>> 
>> I see the change more as a feature rather than a bugfix.
>> 
>> Also it touches some core modules (seq and rcu) in a non trivial way.
>> 
>> 
>> What do you guys think?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Daniele
>> 
>> On 22/07/2016 15:03, "Flavio Leitner" <f...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >(adding ovs-dev mailing list and more people interesting on the
>> >backport to CC)
>> >
>> >On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 05:31:52AM +0000, Vinod, Chegu wrote:
>> >> Hi Flavio, Karl,
>> >>
>> >> Is there a version of the following fix available that is compatible with 
>> >> OVS
>> 2.5?
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/9dede5cff553d7c4e074f04c52
>> 5
>> >> c1417eb209363
>> >>
>> >> If yes can it backported to the 2.5 branch ?
>> >
>> >branch-2.5 is affected by the same issue.  I tested the patch from
>> >branch master (cherry-pick) and it solved the issue.
>> >
>> >Daniele,
>> >
>> >What do you think? If you agree, do you need me to post the backported
>> >patch or is it enough for you to cherry-pick?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >--
>> >fbl
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to