On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for it being >> considered a set of fixes ... > > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask, but in RHEL > we probably need to backport these anyway, so I made an assumption > (maybe poor) that other systemd distros might use the rhel scripts and > run into this class of issues also. Good net-izen, and all that :) > > -Aaron
Hi Aaron, Thanks for the backport request. I am also interested in these fixes and it's something I could use in the SUSE package as well. For my point of view I see no blockers for those updating their 2.5.0 installations with these fixes in but I will do some testing on my end as well. -- markos SUSE LINUX GmbH | GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409, Nürnberg _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
