Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> writes: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 09/08/2016 05:50 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: >> > >> >> It sounds like new feature territory, but you do make a case for >> > it being considered a set of fixes ... >> > >> > I agree - it straddles a line. I was hesitant to even ask, but in RHEL >> > we probably need to backport these anyway, so I made an assumption >> > (maybe poor) that other systemd distros might use the rhel scripts and >> > run into this class of issues also. Good net-izen, and all that :) >> > >> > -Aaron >> >> Hi Aaron, >> >> Thanks for the backport request. I am also interested in these fixes and >> it's something I could use in the SUSE package as well. For my point of >> view I see no blockers for those updating their 2.5.0 installations with >> these fixes in but I will do some testing on my end as well. > > I don't know whether we came to a conclusion on this or whether the > discussion just dropped. Is it still desirable?
It's definitely desirable from my PoV. I'd like to see it, and have already gotten it packaged in a local copy of an RPM, just doing some testing. I don't know if Russell or Flavio have any thoughts. Thanks, Ben! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev