Haha, all 444 belongs to me!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-444
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-444
:)
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message ----
> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 7:34:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Possible static elimination
>
>
> On Aug 29, 2010, at 9:45 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > Yes David. As posted in some Jira issue I'd like to aim for moving all
> > those
>
> > little helper classes as members to BeanManager and giving them a back
>reference
>
> > to 'their' BeanManager. So all the 'helpers' can accessed via e.g.
> > bm.getDefinitionUtil(); and definitionUtil can easily access the
> > BeanManager
>via
>
> > the back reference it got with the constructer as bm.
> >
> > This way we would be able to keep utils which are perfectly pre-configured
>for
>
> > each webapp and additionally eliminate most of the unnecessary calls.
> >
> > wdyt?
>
> Count me in for helping with that :) Would be a fantastic change.
>
> > Oh yea, all work on this will be done after -alpha-2 of course ;)
>
> Anxiously waiting :)
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
> >> To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org
> >> Sent: Mon, August 30, 2010 2:51:00 AM
> >> Subject: Possible static elimination
> >>
> >> Sort of a big topic and I'd like to throw this out there to get a feel of
>where
>
> >> people's heads are at.
> >>
> >> The basis of the architecture is static methods with hash table lookups
> >> on
>the
>
> >> other end. There are about 110 static uses to BeanManager.getManager()
> >> in
>impl
>
> >> alone and each one of those is a hashtable lookup. At runtime it's in
>the
>
> >> thousands.
> >>
> >> This is making integration very hard and also performs quite badly due
> >> to
> >> continuous cost of lookups.
> >>
> >> Is there any interest in moving away from this and start peeling some of
>these
>
> >> away?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
