+1 regards, gerhard
http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/2/13 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots of follow up > failures like one can currently see in glassfish and JBossAS. > > For getting this done if e.g. an EE server needs to implement the CDI-1.0 > spec then this can still be provided via a custom ScannerService Impl, > isn't? > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Sun, 2/13/11, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > From: Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Fwd: [jira] Commented: (OWB-472) archive centric beans.xml > enabling > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > Date: Sunday, February 13, 2011, 8:52 PM > > Isn't the current code pretty > > non-intrusive and no behavior change by default? > > > > Is there something like a draft to cite that shows what > > overhaul in > > this area is due in 1.1? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Mark Struberg (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> > > Date: Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 3:40 PM > > Subject: [jira] Commented: (OWB-472) archive centric > > beans.xml enabling > > To: dev@openwebbeans.apache.org > > > > > > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12994150#comment-12994150 > > ] > > > > Mark Struberg commented on OWB-472: > > ----------------------------------- > > > > I fear we need to rollback the commits. The problem with > > this is that > > the whole BDA definition is UTTERLY broken in the spec. > > This resulted > > in a spec change which is due to 1.1. See CDI-18 for more > > information. > > By implementing the same sh**t than Weld currently has > > (they are > > forced to, but hey, we are not the RI ;) we just corrupt > > any normal > > modus operandi. > > > > Comments are welcome. > > > > > archive centric beans.xml enabling > > > ----------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: OWB-472 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-472 > > > Project: OpenWebBeans > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > Components: Injection and Lookup > > > Reporter: Jacquelle Leggett > > > Assignee: Mark Struberg > > > Attachments: patch.txt > > > > > > Original Estimate: 336h > > > Remaining Estimate: 336h > > > > > > This issue was discussed in great detail in June ( > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openwebbeans-dev/201006.mbox/browser > ) > > on the developers forum. The title of the thread is > > "problems with lack of archive-centric BeanManager". > > > The main problem is described below (snippet from > > discussion): > > > "...Our current design does not permit either of the > > following scenarions, AFAICT: > > > b.jar and c.jar both enable the interceptor defined > > in a.jar > > > (treated as a duplicate) > > > Exactly one of b.jar and c.jar enables the > > interceptor defined in > > > a.jar (ends up enabled for beans from either archive > > if enabled in one > > > -- this is in the more troubling neighborhood)..." > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > For more information on JIRA, see: > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Eric Covener > > cove...@gmail.com > > > > > >
