joe told me that there is no impact (per default) and that wasn't correct. OWB-472 ("optional support for archive centric beans.xml") looks like a new feature which shouldn't be in the core. furthermore, the implementation is also improvable.
regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2011/2/13 Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18 > > My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots of follow up > failures like one can currently see in glassfish and JBossAS. > > The concept or the code we have? What failure in the other servers? > > > For getting this done if e.g. an EE server needs to implement the CDI-1.0 > spec then this can still be provided via a custom ScannerService Impl, > isn't? > > I don't think so. Without the feature, the core doesn't ask anything > related to a scanner service about this enablement (IIUC, I'm not > intimately familiar with this one) > > You could stuff more into the ScannerService SPI instead of having it > split between the extensions to ScannerService and the XMLBDA thing, > but that seems like a cosmetic distinction. >