joe told me that there is no impact (per default) and that wasn't correct.
OWB-472 ("optional support for archive centric beans.xml") looks like a new
feature which shouldn't be in the core.
furthermore, the implementation is also improvable.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/13 Eric Covener <[email protected]>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-18
> > My personal fear is that this will quickly lead to lots of follow up
> failures like one can currently see in glassfish and JBossAS.
>
> The concept or the code we have? What failure in the other servers?
>
> > For getting this done if e.g. an EE server needs to implement the CDI-1.0
> spec then this can still be provided via a custom ScannerService Impl,
> isn't?
>
> I don't think so. Without the feature, the core doesn't ask anything
> related to a scanner service about this enablement (IIUC, I'm not
> intimately familiar with this one)
>
> You could stuff more into the ScannerService SPI instead of having it
> split between the extensions to ScannerService and the XMLBDA thing,
> but that seems like a cosmetic distinction.
>
