IncompatibleClassChangeError, classpath is probably corrupted with an owb 1.0 dependency somehow
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2017-06-19 8:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > Oh txs for the catch, will check. > > LieGrue, > Strub > > Am 19.06.2017 um 04:47 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > Hmm so DeltaSpike is seeing 11 test failures with OWB2. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/ > DeltaSpike%20OWB%202.0.0/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > CDI Ctrl Servlet - it looks like a weird error, the impl of this bean > hasn't been changed in 2 years. Not sure if this is a new validation in > place. > > ClasspathResourceTest - I'm not sure if the path is getting skewed due to > duplicate resources, or the same resource being added multiple times. > > JSF & Scheduler look like changes in the dependency structure. If on > purpose, I'll push up a fix sometime tomorrow. > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 10:04 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 2 things to check before the release: >> >> 1. se API (not covered by tck and poorly covered by us ATM) >> 2. the fastMatching flag should get removed if we can (created due to 1 >> tck) >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory >> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> >> 2017-06-18 15:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >> >>> OWB itself did always ignore it and log a warning. This code did not get >>> changed for a while. >>> >>> But we have/had a bug in the arquillian connector which lead to blowing >>> up on NoClassDefFound. >>> I need to check whether we fixed this already with another commit. >>> >>> The ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1179 >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> > Am 18.06.2017 um 13:45 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >>> > >>> > Just wondering, did you change the behavior when a class isn't found to >>> > ignore the bean? Prior versions of OWB would throw an exception. >>> > >>> > John >>> > >>> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 4:43 PM Mark Struberg < >>> strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Yes, it should 'just work' afaict. >>> >> We even kept the SPI the same. >>> >> We most likely will add an async event related API for better >>> integration >>> >> within TomEE in the future. >>> >> But this should still be perfectly backward compatible as OWB will >>> provide >>> >> a default implementation anyway! >>> >> >>> >> If you catch any (unexpected) problems then just ping us. >>> >> >>> >> txs and LieGrue, >>> >> strub >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> Am 17.06.2017 um 22:36 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org >>> >: >>> >>> >>> >>> So... just to confirm. Outside of changing the geronimo specs, >>> taking a >>> >> OWB 1.x profile that I may have will just work with OWB 2? >>> >>> >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 1:53 PM Mark Struberg < >>> strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, it is 1:1 backward compatible. >>> >>> >>> >>> The only thing you need to update is the jcdi and common-annotations >>> API: >>> >>> >>> >>> <dependency> >>> >>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> >>> >>> <artifactId>geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec</artifactId> >>> >>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> >>> >>> <dependency> >>> >>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> >>> >>> <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec</artifactId> >>> >>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> >>> >>> They will be released this week as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> >>> strub >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Am 17.06.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Ludovic Pénet <l.pe...@senat.fr>: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Is it a drop i' remplacement ? >>> >>>> If yes, I would gladky test this works, before test driving the new >>> >> features. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Ludovic >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Le 17 juin 2017 19:38:01 GMT+02:00, Mark Struberg < >>> strub...@yahoo.de> >>> >> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi folks! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now >>> >> successfully pass the standalone TCK! >>> >>>> A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots >>> >> repository [1]. >>> >>>> This get's deployed via Jenkins each night. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback! >>> >>>> We gonna release it somewhen next week. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> txs and LieGrue, >>> >>>> strub >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma >>> >> brièveté. >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> >>
