Hi Romain Because this is a new initiative, it must follow the ASF rules even if graduate as a subproject
But imo, this is not a subproject, because it has different aims from owb core, owb aim is just implement the specification Please have a look http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject-or-top-level So my advice is to write an incubator project , sponsored by the owb, and graduate as sub or top level project ( my vote will be as tlp) We can also bring this issue in a board report and getting advice from the board Regards Gurkan > On 25 Jun 2017, at 22:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Le 25 juin 2017 21:03, "Gurkan Erdogdu" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Romain > > Because it is a very different mind , it just uses the owb but may also use > other cdi implementation in the future > > > No no. You missed a central point : owb+cxf+tomcat highly integrated vs a > portable stack like hammock is. Here we just want to integrate our preferred > stack. > > > Also, it may implement the microprofile speficiation > > > It could but still compat with owb afaik. > > > Also it has its own project page, codebase, release cycle, issues etc. It > just depends on owb as library > > True, it is a subproject > > > > So for the future perpective, it is now to route for such action at the > beginning, and so it will much more getting attraction from the asf and other > communities > > We used a subproject cause was proven being wrong on this hypothesis we did > for some other incubator projects > > > > I will be gald to help on such effort > > Why not helping here? > > > Regards > > Gurkan > >> On 25 Jun 2017, at 21:56, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> Hi Gurkan >> >> What is the rational behind such a reasonning since core of meecrowave is >> owb and that we agreed to import? >> >> Side note: tomee doesnt fit since we dont impl specs bit just build a server >> centered around owb to avoid tomcat integration issues we often see on the >> list. >> >> Le 25 juin 2017 20:44, "Gurkan Erdogdu" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >>> Hi all >>> >>> As I said earlier , Meecrowave project needs to be seperated from owb, it >>> has own project page, codebase, issues, release cycle etc. There are two >>> options in here either Tomee subproject or new in incubator project. My >>> binding vote will be -1 for such release otherwise. I know that incubator >>> projects needs much more admin work but from my opinion this is the way of >>> introducing such new project in ASF >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Gurkan >>> >>> > On 17 Jun 2017, at 20:38, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi folks! >>> > >>> > We are finished with implementing all CDI-2.0 features and now >>> > successfully pass the standalone TCK! >>> > A recent owb-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT is deployed to the Apache Snapshots >>> > repository [1]. >>> > This get's deployed via Jenkins each night. >>> > >>> > It would be great if you could try it out and give us some feedback! >>> > We gonna release it somewhen next week. >>> > >>> > txs and LieGrue, >>> > strub >>> > >>> > >>> > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ >>> >
