pushed with a small bonus: @Scopes to do it on methods Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le jeu. 20 sept. 2018 à 13:41, Waldemar Reusch <waldemar.reu...@googlemail.com.invalid> a écrit : > I'm cool with you fixing it straight. Otherwise I'd have to see if I can > get the whole development environment going and I'm not too keep to > reinstall svn to be honest =D > best, > Waldemar > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:12 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > PS: until it is fixed you can use org.apache.meecrowave.junit.ScopeRule > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 17 sept. 2018 à 14:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > a > > écrit : > > > > > Hi Waldemar, > > > > > > this is right, do you want to submit a PR to fix it or do you prefer we > > > fix it straight? > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 17 sept. 2018 à 14:03, Waldemar Reusch > > > <waldemar.reu...@googlemail.com.invalid> a écrit : > > > > > >> Hey guys, > > >> > > >> first time on a mailing list, please bear with me. > > >> > > >> I was trying to test request scoped beans using meecrowave-junit, and > > the > > >> test kept crashing with the following exception: > > >> > > >> javax.enterprise.context.ContextNotActiveException: WebBeans context > > with > > >> scope type annotation @RequestScoped does not exist within current > > thread > > >> at > > >> > > >> > > > org.apache.webbeans.container.BeanManagerImpl.getContext(BeanManagerImpl.java:329) > > >> at > > >> > > >> > > > org.apache.webbeans.intercept.NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.getContextualInstance(NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java:89) > > >> at > > >> > > >> > > > org.apache.webbeans.intercept.RequestScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.getContextualInstance(RequestScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java:76) > > >> at > > >> > > >> > > > org.apache.webbeans.intercept.NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.get(NormalScopedBeanInterceptorHandler.java:71) > > >> ... > > >> > > >> While digging, I came across MeecrowaveExtension:getScopes, and while > > >> stepping through I'm realizing that the returned optional will always > > >> contain null, because > > >> - this method is only called in beforeEach, afterEach, therefore > > >> context.getElement() will always return a method instance > > >> - method instances will never have a MeecrowaveConfig annotation, > since > > >> that annotation is only allowed for types (MeecrowaveConfig:L35) > > >> > > >> Overriding the MeecrowaveConfig annotation with a local copy which has > > the > > >> annotation targets {TYPE, METHOD} (instead of TYPE only) allows me to > > >> annotate the tested method with @MeecrowaveConfig(scopes = > > >> RequestScoped.class), which seems to be the intended behavior. > > >> > > >> Is this a known bug? Or am I missing something else? > > >> > > >> best, > > >> Waldemar > > >> > > > > > >
