Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one before - likely https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513 - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> a écrit : > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :) > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > > Hi Romain, > > > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton > > startup like it: > > > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct; > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy; > > import javax.ejb.Singleton; > > import javax.ejb.Startup; > > > > @Singleton > > @Startup > > public class KernelShutdownListener { > > > > @PostConstruct > > private void startup() { > > System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP"); > > } > > > > @PreDestroy > > private void shutdown() { > > System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN"); > > } > > } > > > > It was not possible without that change, as you can see here: > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get Unsafe.defineClass > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801) > > at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native > Method) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.<init>(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.<init>(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:153) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:116) > > at > > > org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167) > > at org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41) > > at > > > org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963) > > ... 17 more > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: > > sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String, [B, int, int, > > java.lang.ClassLoader, java.security.ProtectionDomain) > > at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476) > > at > > > org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807) > > ... 27 more > > > > 05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-2] > > jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Error deploying web > > application archive [/tmp/apache-tomee-plume-7.0.6-TT.2/webapps/ROOT.war] > > java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start: > > org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component > > [StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[]] > > at > > > org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:758) > > at > > org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:730) > > at > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:734) > > at > > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployWAR(HostConfig.java:985) > > at > > > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployWar.run(HostConfig.java:1857) > > at > > > java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515) > > at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264) > > at > > > java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) > > at > > > java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) > > at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) > > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:24, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > >> Hi Daniel, > >> > >> Do you know which part implies the "need", this commit was not suppose > to > >> change anything since the code was already supporting java 11, it was > just > >> intended to prepare potential change later on. > >> Did a small change in the behavior was introduced - if so it was not > >> intended from my part? > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >> < > >> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > >> > > >> > >> > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> a > >> écrit : > >> > >> > Hi Folks, > >> > > >> > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the backport > >> for > >> > it: > >> > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 > >> > > >> > Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you think. > >> > > >> > Thank you. > >> > -- > >> > Daniel "soro" Cunha > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Daniel "soro" Cunha > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ > > > > > -- > Daniel "soro" Cunha > https://twitter.com/dvlc_ >
