Hi Romain,

You right, the backport include other things which are important as well
like:
changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.

But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)

Thank you for your review.

Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one before -
> likely
>
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
>
> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> a écrit
> :
>
> > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :)
> >
> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi Romain,
> > >
> > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton
> > > startup like it:
> > >
> > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
> > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
> > > import javax.ejb.Singleton;
> > > import javax.ejb.Startup;
> > >
> > > @Singleton
> > > @Startup
> > > public class KernelShutdownListener {
> > >
> > >     @PostConstruct
> > >     private void startup() {
> > >         System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     @PreDestroy
> > >     private void shutdown() {
> > >         System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > It was not possible without that change, as you can see here:
> > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get
> Unsafe.defineClass
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
> > >     at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
> > Method)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.<init>(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.<init>(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:153)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:116)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167)
> > >     at org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963)
> > >     ... 17 more
> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
> > > sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String, [B, int, int,
> > > java.lang.ClassLoader, java.security.ProtectionDomain)
> > >     at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807)
> > >     ... 27 more
> > >
> > > 05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-2]
> > > jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Error deploying
> web
> > > application archive
> [/tmp/apache-tomee-plume-7.0.6-TT.2/webapps/ROOT.war]
> > >  java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start:
> > > org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component
> > > [StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[]]
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:758)
> > >     at
> > > org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:730)
> > >     at
> > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:734)
> > >     at
> > > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployWAR(HostConfig.java:985)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployWar.run(HostConfig.java:1857)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> > >     at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> > >     at
> > >
> >
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> > >     at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
> > >
> > >
> > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:24, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > >
> > >> Hi Daniel,
> > >>
> > >> Do you know which part implies the "need", this commit was not suppose
> > to
> > >> change anything since the code was already supporting java 11, it was
> > just
> > >> intended to prepare potential change later on.
> > >> Did a small change in the behavior was introduced - if so it was not
> > >> intended from my part?
> > >>
> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Folks,
> > >> >
> > >> > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the
> backport
> > >> for
> > >> > it:
> > >> > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> > >> >
> > >> > Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you
> think.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you.
> > >> > --
> > >> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Reply via email to