hi folks,

patch updated again: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 :)

Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha <daniels...@apache.org>
escreveu:

> Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch.
>
> Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com escreveu:
>
>> +1 to not change the old default
>>
>> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Except the default to bytecode for java 8 - fear we have to stick to j6
>> or
>> > 7 if we want to change here - it looks good.
>> >
>> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 20:59, Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > a écrit :
>> >
>> > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it tomorrow then.
>> > >
>> > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > daniels...@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > >
>> > > > I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
>> > > > Thank you.
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> > > >
>> > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha <
>> daniels...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > escreveu:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i have to
>> > merge
>> > > it
>> > > > >> manually), so i can commit both?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> daniels...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11
>> (officially) on
>> > > OWB
>> > > > >> > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply
>> it
>> > > > >> without
>> > > > >> > > migrating to asm7?
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Do we have plan to merge it?
>> > > > >> > > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > >> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Hello Daniel,
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > it is ok for me
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > >> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > >> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
>> Book
>> > > > >> > > > > <
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > daniels...@apache.org>
>> > > > >> a
>> > > > >> > > > écrit
>> > > > >> > > > > :
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see
>> > something
>> > > > to
>> > > > >> be
>> > > > >> > > > > changed?
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > daniels...@gmail.com
>> > > > >> > > > > > escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > You right, the backport include other things which
>> are
>> > > > >> important
>> > > > >> > as
>> > > > >> > > > > well
>> > > > >> > > > > > > like:
>> > > > >> > > > > > > changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and
>> > > > >> > > > > InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > But yes, the backport includes the commit that you
>> > refer.
>> > > :)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > Thank you for your review.
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain
>> Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > >> > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you
>> want
>> > > but
>> > > > >> one
>> > > > >> > > > before
>> > > > >> > > > > -
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> likely
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> - but it was included in the commit you backported
>> ;).
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>> Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>> |
>> > > Book
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> <
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > daniels...@apache.org>
>> > > > >> > > a
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> écrit :
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using
>> JDK11
>> > :)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > > > > daniels...@gmail.com
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Well... that change make me possible to continue
>> > > create
>> > > > >> my
>> > > > >> > > > > singleton
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > startup like it:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > import javax.ejb.Singleton;
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > import javax.ejb.Startup;
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > @Singleton
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > @Startup
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > public class KernelShutdownListener {
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     @PostConstruct
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     private void startup() {
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >         System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     }
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     @PreDestroy
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     private void shutdown() {
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >         System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     }
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > }
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > It was not possible without that change, as you
>> can
>> > > see
>> > > > >> > here:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException:
>> Cannot
>> > > get
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> Unsafe.defineClass
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > Method)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.<init>(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.<init>(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:153)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.<init>(WebBeansContext.java:116)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     ... 17 more
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String,
>> [B,
>> > > int,
>> > > > >> int,
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > java.lang.ClassLoader,
>> > > java.security.ProtectionDomain)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     ... 27 more
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > 05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE
>> > > [localhost-startStop-2]
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>> > > > >> Error
>> > > > >> > > > > deploying
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> web
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > application archive
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> [/tmp/apache-tomee-plume-7.0.6-TT.2/webapps/ROOT.war]
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >  java.lang.IllegalStateException:
>> > > > ContainerBase.addChild:
>> > > > >> > > start:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed
>> to
>> > > start
>> > > > >> > > > component
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >>
>> [StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[]]
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:758)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > >
>> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:730)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:734)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployWAR(HostConfig.java:985)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployWar.run(HostConfig.java:1857)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> >
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >     at
>> > > java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:24, Romain
>> > > Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Hi Daniel,
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Do you know which part implies the "need", this
>> > > commit
>> > > > >> was
>> > > > >> > > not
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> suppose
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > to
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> change anything since the code was already
>> > > supporting
>> > > > >> java
>> > > > >> > > 11,
>> > > > >> > > > it
>> > > > >> > > > > > was
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > just
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> intended to prepare potential change later on.
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Did a small change in the behavior was
>> introduced
>> > -
>> > > if
>> > > > >> so
>> > > > >> > it
>> > > > >> > > > was
>> > > > >> > > > > > not
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> intended from my part?
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>
>> |
>> > > > Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> LinkedIn <
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> > >
>> > > |
>> > > > >> Book
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> <
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > > > daniels...@apache.org
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > a
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> écrit :
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > Hi Folks,
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x
>> and
>> > > we
>> > > > >> need
>> > > > >> > > the
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> backport
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> for
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > it:
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > Please take a look at those changes and let
>> me
>> > > know
>> > > > >> what
>> > > > >> > do
>> > > > >> > > > you
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> think.
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > Thank you.
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > --
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > --
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > --
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >>
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > > > --
>> > > > >> > > > > > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > --
>> > > > >> > > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > --
>> > > > >> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > >> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > > > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Reply via email to