[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16888007#comment-16888007
 ] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on OWB-1293:
-----------------------------------------

[[email protected]] can you try to add cdi in the test 
(tests/test-distribution/src/test/java/org/eclipse/jetty/tests/distribution/CDITests.java)
 through `--add-to-start`. 
tests/test-webapps/test-cdi-webapp/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jetty-env.xml can 
also to use org.apache.webbeans.container.ManagerObjectFactory instead of the 
weld one. Then it seems there is a classloader issue on the cdi initializer 
making it skipped but I guess you will make it a server class faster than me to 
enable it to be loaded from the container ;). Last thing to change is likely 
jetty-cdi/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/cdi/CdiDecorator.java since the 
destroy should release the creationcontext created in the decorate and not call 
cdi.Destroy which destroys an Instance and not any instance.

> Update Jetty integration prior to Jetty-10 release
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OWB-1293
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1293
>             Project: OpenWebBeans
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Interceptor and Decorators
>            Reporter: Greg Wilkins
>            Priority: Major
>
> The current jetty integration relies on exposing private jetty APIs so a 
> jetty Decorator can be registered.   This is fragile and requires different 
> APIs for the upcoming jetty-10 release.
> Instead, Jetty is developing a mechanism where a object with a decorator 
> signature can be set as a context attribute and it will be introspected and 
> dynamically registered as a decorator without any API dependencies.
> This is currently being developed in 
> [https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/3838] and an integration with 
> Weld is at [https://github.com/weld/core/pull/1926] 
> Feedback is sought from the OpenWebBeans team on the approach and then we'd 
> like to collaborate to make a similar integration.
>  
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to