philippkunz commented on a change in pull request #28:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/28#discussion_r439843265
##########
File path:
webbeans-junit5/src/main/java/org/apache/openwebbeans/junit5/internal/CdiExtension.java
##########
@@ -104,40 +112,42 @@ public void beforeAll(final ExtensionContext
extensionContext)
.peek(Supplier::get)
.filter(Objects::nonNull)
.toArray(Closeable[]::new);
+ SeContainer container = initializer.initialize();
if (reusable)
{
- reusableContainer = initializer.initialize();
+ reusableContainer = container;
Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook(new Thread(
() -> doClose(reusableContainer), getClass().getName() +
"-shutdown"));
}
else
{
- container = initializer.initialize();
+ testInstanceContainer = container;
}
}
@Override
public void afterAll(final ExtensionContext extensionContext)
{
- if (container != null)
+ if (testInstanceContainer != null)
{
- doClose(container);
- container = null;
+ doClose(testInstanceContainer);
+ testInstanceContainer = null;
}
}
@Override
public void beforeEach(final ExtensionContext extensionContext)
{
- if (container == null && reusableContainer == null)
+ final SeContainer container = getContainer();
+ if (container == null)
Review comment:
That sounds to me more like the `beforeAll` callback had missed to find
the `@Cdi` annontation(s) by not looking at the right execution context(s in
various places up the nesting or inheritance or annotation hierarchies) rather
than having not been invoked at all, which in turn sounds to me more like an
existing bug or incompleteness. It answers my question whether to remove it or
not so let's not change it for now.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
