It is the only identified/expected one at least, did you spot another one?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 22:07, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> I'm not sure it's only package scope methods ...
>
> Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 21:59, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > Well it is a config in owb.properties but as mentionned it will not
> support
> > package scope methods proxying by design (but it is in the spec).
> >
> > For this, add-opens are required (or a fake module-info workaround).
> >
> > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 21:48, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Here is what I have done ....
> > >
> > > Switch from Unsafe to ClassLoaderProxyService in the
> > AbstractProxyFactory.
> > > Then, command line and run `mvn clean install`
> > >
> > > It fails under JDK 8 and under JDK17
> > >
> > > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 20:40, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Not sure what you mean but we should build on jdk 8 and run on 8-18.
> > > >
> > > > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 20:29, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > > > a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > While investigating some OWB issues, I tried moving default Unsafe
> to
> > > > > ClassLoaderProxyService, but it looks like I can't build OWB
> anymore,
> > > on
> > > > > JDK8 or even JDK17.
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't it supposed to be working out of the box?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Reply via email to