it is because the quick and dirty change leds to use 2 services instance so
test is right there and quick and dirty change is wrong ;)

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mer. 6 oct. 2021 à 10:21, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Quick and dirty change in AbstractProxyFactory
>
> definingService = new ClassLoaderProxyService(webBeansContext); //
> webBeansContext.getService(DefiningClassService.class);
>
> `mvn clean install` under JDK8
>
> [ERROR] Failures:
> > [ERROR]   ClassLoaderProxyServiceTest.defineInProxy:45
> >
> expected:<org.apache.webbeans.service.ClassLoaderProxyService$ProxiesClassLoader@3f9e00de
> >
> > but
> >
> was:<org.apache.webbeans.service.ClassLoaderProxyService$ProxiesClassLoader@358a12a5
> > >
> > [ERROR]   InterceptorAnnotatedDiscoveryTest.discover:62 expected:<[foo]>
> > but was:<[bar]>
> > [ERROR]   NormalScopeProxyFactoryTest.testProtectedMethod:321
> > expected:<42> but was:<0>
> > [ERROR] Errors:
> > [ERROR]
> >
> InterceptionOfBeanWithConstructorInjectionTest.checkBeanWasBuiltWithItsConstructorAndIntercepted:54->AbstractUnitTest.startContainer:231->AbstractUnitTest.inject:251
> > » IllegalState
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 589, Failures: 3, Errors: 1, Skipped: 5
> > [
>
>
>  Haven't got time to debug and look at why yet
>
> Le mer. 6 oct. 2021 à 10:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > Haven't look quickly but I can easily change the default again and run
> the
> > build again.
> >
> > Le mer. 6 oct. 2021 à 08:10, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> It is the only identified/expected one at least, did you spot another
> one?
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >> <
> >>
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 22:07, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >> > I'm not sure it's only package scope methods ...
> >> >
> >> > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 21:59, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >> a
> >> > écrit :
> >> >
> >> > > Well it is a config in owb.properties but as mentionned it will not
> >> > support
> >> > > package scope methods proxying by design (but it is in the spec).
> >> > >
> >> > > For this, add-opens are required (or a fake module-info workaround).
> >> > >
> >> > > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 21:48, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeano...@gmail.com>
> >> a
> >> > > écrit :
> >> > >
> >> > > > Here is what I have done ....
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Switch from Unsafe to ClassLoaderProxyService in the
> >> > > AbstractProxyFactory.
> >> > > > Then, command line and run `mvn clean install`
> >> > > >
> >> > > > It fails under JDK 8 and under JDK17
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 20:40, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >> > >
> >> > > a
> >> > > > écrit :
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Not sure what you mean but we should build on jdk 8 and run on
> >> 8-18.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Le mar. 5 oct. 2021 à 20:29, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >> > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > a écrit :
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > While investigating some OWB issues, I tried moving default
> >> Unsafe
> >> > to
> >> > > > > > ClassLoaderProxyService, but it looks like I can't build OWB
> >> > anymore,
> >> > > > on
> >> > > > > > JDK8 or even JDK17.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Isn't it supposed to be working out of the box?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Jean-Louis
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Louis
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Reply via email to