Hello, whiskers
I am at the risk of expanding too much the scope of what I am trying to do, so
I want to try to focus and work step by step.
So I am writing down my plan for review.
# Step one: implement a good support for GoLang, with piped standard input and
output, and log in stderr.
Because there is not a past support for Go, except the generic docker support,
I think I have some freedom here.
The support will then work this way (please review carefully):
## /init
The runtime expects posted in /init the usual
{
"binary": ...
"code": ...
"main": ..
}
where "code" is either a zip file (with binary: true) or a source code (with
binary: false or absent).
If it source code, it expects to be a go source.
It places in /action/main/exec.go and compiles it with go build -o /action/exec
/action/main/exec.go, getting a /action/exec to execute.
If is is a zip file, it will unzip it in /action. If there is a /action/exec
file in the zip it will run it.
If there is not, it will look if there is a "main" parameter, getting the
<main-value>.
It will compile a /action/main/<main-value>.go. If the <main-value> is missing,
it will default to /action/main/exec.go.
Note the zip can include other source files that will be stored in
/action/<folders>. So I will have to use GOPATH=/action to find them.
## /run
The /run behaviour is:
At every request, if no action process is running,it will start one and will
pass the first line as an argument and also in standard output.
If the executable does not terminate, it will keep feeding more input in
standard input, expecting output in standard output (line by line) and logs in
stderr.
The server will have to collect stderr logs and write them in docker stdout,
and terminate the output with the markers when an action completes:
XXX_THE_END_OF_A_WHISK_ACTIVATION_XXX
XXX_THE_END_OF_A_WHISK_ACTIVATION_XXX
It the executable DOES terminate, it will execute again at the next /run request
## Step 2: need to implement the same logic for swift actions (we have to keep
the existing compilation infrastructure)
Issues to solve here are the compilation and the "warm" startup problem. I have
some ideas but... I do better to discuss them once the Go support is finished.
## Step 3: will discuss with the list if it is worth to extend the support to
the generic dockerskeleton, that is based on the python proxy.
There are compatibility issues, because the current docker support logs
everything in stdout and the last line is the answer, while for using the pipe
you need to do separate log.
How does it sound?
Suggested or required changes?
Am I missing something?
Approved?
--
Michele Sciabarra
openwh...@sciabarra.com
