This is pure go source code as the client. If there is no server(openwhisk not 
release or available), how do we test? If there is an openwhisk, we just grab 
it and run it. We need to add the steps as the instructions, but it is based on 
there is an openwhisk service running. I mean if only release this go client 
code, there is nothing we can run it against.

No need to build it, since it is not CLI. We do not need to generate anything.
 
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)

Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud

Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States

-----Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Rodric Rabbah <rod...@gmail.com>
Date: 06/22/2018 03:40AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating

> It’s reasonable to assume that when it goes to the Incubator people, they are 
> going to have another list of items to address that are again nothing to do 
> with the operation of the code.

Quite likely - I’m of the same opinion. So reducing the surface makes sense to 
me. Getting through all the way with a successful first step to release at 
least one of the repos is a sensible strategy given this is a first Apache 
release for the project. 

I looked through https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go and it 
is the entirely self contained - all go code, no deps on other openwhisk repos.

The readme doesn’t have a built step though   (Or test although there are a 
handful of go tests in the repo).

I also don’t see why we have to use different release numbers. Each of the 
components was broken out to make them independently managed so why couldn’t 
they all eventually be released as 0.9 as part of the overall first 
distributions?

-r

Reply via email to