Hi Dominic. I have read the POEM and provided some suggestions and posed some questions in the PR.
In general, I support this direction. In fact, I think it will work well with the POEM I have been (slowly) working on and want to submit for containerless functions in support of edge use cases and using isolates. This is a substantial innovation to the project - thank you and @ningyougang, @keonhee, @jiangpengcheng, @upgle for contributing this work to the project. -r On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM Dominic Kim <style9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear whiskers. > > I want to see if there is anyone with comments. > As per our guideline[1], I am supposed to proceed with a vote to let my PR > be included and start development. > > Before opening a vote, please share your opinion. > As discussed, we would incrementally merge small pieces of PRs while > allowing some transient incomplete codes such as some modules without > counterparts, some modules with dummy codes. > Even if this kind of code would be complete as more PRs are merged, I hope > we can form a consensus about this in advance. > > > > Thank you > Best regards > Dominic > > * [1] POEM guideline: > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/proposals/POEM-1-proposal-for-openwhisk-enhancements.md#procedures >
