Dear Whiskers. I would merge the PR* in 24 hours based on the silent consent. Please share your opinion if you have any.
Thanks in advance. -dom * [1] Add a proposal for a new scheduler: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4921 2020년 6월 30일 (화) 오후 11:49, Rodric Rabbah <[email protected]>님이 작성: > Hi Dominic. > > I have read the POEM and provided some suggestions and posed some questions > in the PR. > > In general, I support this direction. In fact, I think it will work well > with the POEM I have been (slowly) working on and want to submit for > containerless functions in support of edge use cases and using isolates. > > This is a substantial innovation to the project - thank you and > @ningyougang, > @keonhee, @jiangpengcheng, @upgle for contributing this work to the > project. > > -r > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:42 PM Dominic Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear whiskers. > > > > I want to see if there is anyone with comments. > > As per our guideline[1], I am supposed to proceed with a vote to let my > PR > > be included and start development. > > > > Before opening a vote, please share your opinion. > > As discussed, we would incrementally merge small pieces of PRs while > > allowing some transient incomplete codes such as some modules without > > counterparts, some modules with dummy codes. > > Even if this kind of code would be complete as more PRs are merged, I > hope > > we can form a consensus about this in advance. > > > > > > > > Thank you > > Best regards > > Dominic > > > > * [1] POEM guideline: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/proposals/POEM-1-proposal-for-openwhisk-enhancements.md#procedures > > >
