Thanks for the information!

Best,
Gang

On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 7:45 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote:

> Just want to add a comment.
>
> All ASF project's main release artifact is the source code tarball as you
> see in the below.
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/orc/orc-1.7.9/orc-1.7.9.tar.gz
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/orc/orc-1.7.9/orc-1.7.9.tar.gz
>
> All the other artifacts like Maven Central(jars) and Homebrew(orc-tools)
> are just auxilary and derived ones.
>
> Dongjoon.
>
> On 2023/11/04 23:41:11 Dongjoon Hyun wrote:
> > Yes, Gang.
> >
> > If there is a patch on a non-EOL release branch, we need to release it
> on time.
> >
> > And, we can skip the release branches if there is no patch.
> >
> > Dongjoon.
> >
> > On 2023/11/04 05:53:49 Gang Wu wrote:
> > > Do we actually need 1.7.10? I see it only has a commit on the C++ side.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Gang
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 4, 2023 at 12:01 AM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for head-ups, William.
> > > >
> > > > Actually I need 1.8.6. :)
> > > >
> > > > - ORC 1.8.6 for Apache Spark 3.4.2 (3rd Maintenance Release) in
> November.
> > > > - ORC 1.7.10 for Apache Spark 3.3.4 (End-Of-Support Release) before
> > > > December 15th.
> > > > - ORC 1.9.2 for Apache Spark 3.5.1 (2nd Maintenance Release) in
> December or
> > > > 2024 Jan.
> > > >
> > > > I'd volunteer for all three.
> > > >
> > > > Dongjoon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 5:28 PM William H. <williamhy...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi All!
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope everyone is having a great fall season so far,
> > > > > ORC 1.7.10 and 1.9.2 are scheduled to release this month on the
> 11th
> > > > > and 17th respectively.
> > > > >
> > > > > - https://github.com/apache/orc/milestone/19
> > > > > - https://github.com/apache/orc/milestone/23
> > > > >
> > > > > Would anyone like to volunteer as the release manager for either of
> > > > > these two versions?
> > > > >
> > > > > Bests,
> > > > > William
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to