I'm going to merge 1) very shortly but I'm going to be pretty busy in the coming week getting ready for Spark Summit. I probably won't have too much time to look at these until after but feel free to review and merge the patches. I can look after if that'd be helpful.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: > hello all, > > We're close to being back in the patch queue red zone. Let me try to > make sense of what needs to reviewed and merged and in what order > (from merge first to merge last): > > 1. PARQUET-167: Nong needs to sign off and merge. > https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/30 > > 2. PARQUET-505: If Nong or Julien could comment and then merge > independent of #1 (there are no obvious conflicts) > https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/44 > > 3. PARQUET-501: Relatively small refactoring, but will need to be > rebased after PARQUET-167 > https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/46 > > 4. PARQUET-497: Pretty invasive refactoring but absolutely essential > for making progress on test fixtures. If this lingers beyond this week > it may block development progress. Requires the other 3 patches to be > merged and will need minor rebasing. > https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/47 > > Small patch that can be merged whenever: > https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/45 > Not ready to merge: https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/43 > > Thank you, > Wes >
