clairemcginty commented on code in PR #1078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1078#discussion_r1182865579
##########
parquet-avro/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/avro/AvroRecordConverter.java:
##########
@@ -169,6 +172,46 @@ public void add(Object value) {
}
}
+ /**
+ * Returns the specific data model for a given SpecificRecord schema by
reflecting the underlying
+ * Avro class's `MODEL$` field, or Null if the class is not on the classpath
or reflection fails.
+ */
+ static SpecificData getModelForSchema(Schema schema) {
+ final Class<?> clazz;
+
+ if (schema != null && (schema.getType() == Schema.Type.RECORD ||
schema.getType() == Schema.Type.UNION)) {
+ clazz = SpecificData.get().getClass(schema);
+ } else {
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ final SpecificData model;
+ try {
+ final Field modelField = clazz.getDeclaredField("MODEL$");
+ modelField.setAccessible(true);
+
+ model = (SpecificData) modelField.get(null);
+ } catch (Exception e) {
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ try {
+ final String avroVersion =
Schema.Parser.class.getPackage().getImplementationVersion();
+ // Avro 1.8 doesn't include conversions in the MODEL$ field
+ if (avroVersion.startsWith("1.8.")) {
Review Comment:
ok, I've added a new test suite, `TestAvroRecordConverter`, that thoroughly
tests `getModelForSchema` with a variety of schema variants and with Avro
versions 1.{7,8,9,10,11}. To do this, I used Powermock to mock the static
invocation used to get Avro runtime version, then I ad-hoc compiled Avro
generated classes using compiler versions 1.{7,8,9,10,11}. Happy to take a
different approach with testing if you prefer -- this just seemed like the most
straightforward way to do it :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@parquet.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
