[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17787244#comment-17787244
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PARQUET-2380:
-----------------------------------------
wgtmac commented on code in PR #1195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1195#discussion_r1397444146
##########
parquet-hadoop/src/main/java/org/apache/parquet/hadoop/util/HadoopOutputFile.java:
##########
@@ -54,11 +54,19 @@ private static boolean supportsBlockSize(FileSystem fs) {
private final Configuration conf;
public static HadoopOutputFile fromPath(Path path, Configuration conf)
- throws IOException {
+ throws IOException {
FileSystem fs = path.getFileSystem(conf);
return new HadoopOutputFile(fs, fs.makeQualified(path), conf);
}
+ public static HadoopOutputFile fromPathUnchecked(Path path, Configuration
conf) {
Review Comment:
Why do we need this?
> Decouple RewriteOptions from Hadoop classes
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PARQUET-2380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2380
> Project: Parquet
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: parquet-mr
> Reporter: Atour Mousavi Gourabi
> Priority: Major
>
> ParquetRewriter's RewriteOptions makes use of Hadoop Path and Configuration,
> where it could instead allow users to specify these using the Parquet
> interface methods as well. This would allow for proper decoupling Hadoop for
> rewriting in a later stage as well.
> This is part of a larger effort to decouple Parquet from Hadoop libraries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
