+1 (binding)

On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, at 3:08 PM, Gábor Szádovszky wrote:
> +1 (binding) - Not sure if "binding" matters for this case
> Thanks, Antoine, for working on this!
>
> Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. márc. 7., Cs,
> 14:18):
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> As discussed previously on this ML [1], I am proposing to expand
>> the types supported by the BYTE_STREAM_SPLIT encoding. The currently
>> supported types are FLOAT and DOUBLE. The proposal expands the
>> supported types to INT32, INT64 and FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY.
>>
>> The format addition is tracked on JIRA where some measurements on
>> sample data are also published and discussed [2].
>>
>> (please note that the original ML thread only discussed expanding
>> to FIXED_LEN_BYTE_ARRAY; discussion on the JIRA issue led to the
>> conclusion that it would also be beneficial to cover INT32 and INT64)
>>
>> The format additions are submitted as a PR in [3].
>> A data file for integration testing is submitted in [4].
>> An implementation for Parquet C++ is submitted in [5].
>> An implementation for parquet-mr is submitted in [6].
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 1 week.
>>
>> +1: Accept the format additions
>> +0: ...
>> -1: Reject the format additions because ...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Antoine.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/5on7rnc141jnw2cdxtsfgm5xhhdmsb4q
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2414
>> [3] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/229
>> [4] https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/46
>> [5] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/40094
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/1291
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to