+1

This makes sense. I was also confused when I had access to
parquet-site for the first time.

Thanks Andrew!

Best,
Gang

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 3:15 AM Vinoo Ganesh <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1, this would be great. It's something Xinli and I discussed when we first
> made the website updates, but it ended up falling off of the list. It would
> be great to have this updated.
>
> <[email protected]>
>
>
> On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 8:52 PM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose changing the default branch of the parquet-site
> > repo from `asf-site` to `production`
> >
> > The `asf-site` branch hosts the static files of the site (aka what is
> built
> > from the source in the `development` branch). Thus since it is the
> default
> > branch that is what appears when people open the parquet-site[1] repo
> >
> > I made a PR to update the readme in the asf-site branch[2] but I think it
> > would be better if we changed the default branch to production. This
> > requires an INFRA JIRA ticket[2], which I am happy to file, but wanted to
> > discuss here first.
> >
> > Andrew Lamb
> > (Apache DataFusion/Arrow PMC, ASF member)
> >
> > p.s.  my not-so-secret agenda is to improve the adoption of the parquet
> > file format by helping with communication and coordination. The
> > parquet.apache.org website plays a key role in this, and thus I want to
> > help lower the barrier to help maintain (and update) it.
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site
> > [2]: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/57
> > [2]:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml?tab=readme-ov-file#default_branch
> >
>

Reply via email to